Its 74fps normal in BioShock was superior to the GTX 970 as well.ĪMD R9 390x kicked on in Crysis 3 and Metro: Last Light. In 3D Mark’s Fire Strike Extreme test it was anearly 13% quicker than the 970 and just 3% more slow than the 980, and in Battlefield 4 its 52fps normal was just three edges behind the GTX 980 and five casings past the GTX 970. It kept up with its lead over the GTX 970 in Crysis 3 and Metro: Last Light, outperformed the Nvidia card in both of our hypothetical tests, and surprisingly got up to speed to the GTX 980 in Middle-Earth: Shadow of Mordor and Tomb Raider.Īt the following goal up – 2,560 x 1,440 – the AMD card’s noteworthy presentation proceeded. Its Battlefield 4 least of 64fps is some 8fps higher than the 970, and its 77fps normal sits easily between the two Nvidia cards. Its most exceedingly awful in-game normal was an aftereffect of 77fps in Battlefield 4, and its best arrangement of results came in Tomb Raider, where it returned least and normal edge paces of 116fps and 150fps.Īll things considered, the AMD card’s presentation certifications were as yet settled at this unobtrusive goal. ![]() ![]() At 1080p it totally controls through the entirety of our benchmarks, all of which we run at unquestionably the most extreme detail settings. AMD R9 390x is entirely fit for supporting a few screens however our exhibition tests demonstrate it’s undeniably fit to use with a solitary screen of up to 2,560 x 1,440 goal.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |